Legal impact of Biofuel (jatropha Curcas) production on communal land in North-East Namibia

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Date
2010
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Abstract povided by author
However, research also revealed that, despite the fact that most traditional authorities regard other institutions as wearisome, they nevertheless seek assistance from these institutions when faced with conflicts involving external parties such as Jatropha companies
The research also focused on the socio-economic benefits that farmers stand to gain from Jatropha. This emanated from the fact that many researchers question the claimed benefits of Jatropha and believe that the current rush to develop Jatropha production on a large scale is ill-conceived, under-studied and could contribute to an unsustainable trade that will not solve the problems of climate change, energy security or poverty
The `food vs biofuel' debate also focuses in the study, as it is feared that Jatropha could replace the production of crops aimed at securing food for communal farmers. Although Jatropha is not farmed on a scale large enough to fully determine this aspect in the Namibian context, in other countries research has shown that Jatropha is planted in direct replacement of food crops by subsistence farmers. However, it is noted that communal farmers in Namibia are in essence subsistence farmers, i.e. they produce what they consume, and major concerns arise when one considers the plan to encourage subsistence farmers to plant large amounts of Jatropha. This is made worse because subsistence farmers have very weak links to markets and their lack of storage capacity, communication and information will make it difficult to benefit from Jatropha
Research also showed that some investors opt for contracts of farming as a land acquisition method. However, the obligations in farming contracts are mostly aimed at protecting the interests of the investment companies, whilst at the same time exploiting the farmers. It is also clear that many of the farmers did not understand the concepts stated in the agreements and their decisions to sign these agreements were clouded by the promise of huge profits and other developmental agendas.  It is common cause that communal land is mostly used for subsistence farming and the introduction of commercial activities such as Jatropha, is interfering with this mode of farming and leading to the commercialisation of the land. It is therefore,  also important to ensure that the legal framework that operates in the communal arena is geared to protect the farmers from exploitation of their communal resources by Jatropha investors and other communal land inhabitants
The Jatropha experience demonstrates that although procedures under both the Communal Land Reform Act as well as the customary law are used to allocate land for Jatropha farming, the two are not properly geared to protect the communal farmers from exploitation by investors. The lack of a remedial mechanism can be attributed to the lack of a harmonious co-existence between customary and statutory law. It is therefore, recommended that the Communal Land Reform Act be revisited by the legislature and that the Act incorporate customary land law practices and principles. There is also need to ensure that the ever growing gap between customary law and statutory law is bridged. However, the major recommendation of the study is the introduction of a National Policy for Biofuels. It is recommended that the policy will be an important tool in facilitating the farming of Jatropha in the country.      
Description
A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Laws(LLM)
Keywords
Jatropha Namibia, Energy crops Namibia, Oilseed plants Namibia, Biodiesel fuels Namibia, Mass energy law and legislation
Citation