Core concepts of human rights and inclusion of vulnerable groups in the mental health policies of Malawi, Namibia, and Sudan

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMannan, Hasheem
dc.contributor.authorElTayeb, Shahla
dc.contributor.authorMacLachlan, Malcolm
dc.contributor.authorAmin, Mutamad
dc.contributor.authorMcVeigh, Joanne
dc.contributor.authorMunthali, Alister
dc.contributor.authorVan Rooy, Gert
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-08T07:51:11Z
dc.date.available2016-06-08T07:51:11Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: One of the most crucial steps towards delivering judicious and comprehensive mental health care is the formulation of a policy and plan that will navigate mental health systems. For policy-makers, the challenges of a high-quality mental health system are considerable: the provision of mental health services to all who need them, in an equitable way, in a mode that promotes human rights and health outcomes. METHOD: EquiFrame, a novel policy analysis framework, was used to evaluate the mental health policies of Malawi, Namibia, and Sudan. The health policies were assessed in terms of their coverage of 21 predefined Core Concepts of human rights (Core Concept Coverage), their stated quality of commitment to said Core Concepts (Core Concept Quality), and their inclusion of 12 Vulnerable Groups (Vulnerable Group Coverage). In relation to these summary indices, each policy was also assigned an Overall Summary Ranking, in terms of it being of High, Moderate, or Low quality. RESULTS: Substantial variability was identified across EquiFrame’s summary indices for the mental health policies of Malawi, Namibia, and Sudan. However, all three mental health policies scored high on Core Concept Coverage. Particularly noteworthy was the Sudanese policy, which scored 86% on Core Concept Coverage, and 92% on Vulnerable Group Coverage. Particular deficits were evident in the Malawian mental health policy, which scored 33% on Vulnerable Group Coverage and 47% on Core Concept Quality, and was assigned an Overall Summary Ranking of Low accordingly. The Overall Summary Ranking for the Namibian Mental Health Policy was High; for the Sudanese Mental Health Policy was Moderate; and for the Malawian Mental Health Policy was Low. CONCLUSIONS: If human rights and equity underpin policy formation, it is more likely that they will be inculcated in health service delivery. EquiFrame may provide a novel and valuable tool for mental health policy analysis in relation to core concepts of human rights and inclusion of vulnerable groups, a key practical step in the successful realization of the Millennium Development Goals.en_US
dc.identifier.citationMannan, H., ElTayeb, S., MacLachlan, M., Amin, M., McVeigh, J., Muthali, A., & van Rooy, G. (2013). Core concepts of human rights and inclusion of vulnerable groups in the mental health policies of Malawi, Namibia, and Sudan. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 7(7), 1-13.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11070/1734
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.source.urihttp://ijmhs.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1752-4458-7-7#Abs1en_US
dc.subjectMental health policyen_US
dc.subjectHuman rightsen_US
dc.subjectVulnerable groupsen_US
dc.titleCore concepts of human rights and inclusion of vulnerable groups in the mental health policies of Malawi, Namibia, and Sudanen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Research Articles (SSD)